Recently I
took a person from Switzerland to Mickey’s Tavern on the east side of Madison
(WI), because he had read about it in the New
York Times. We could have gone to
about thirty other places for the food and the feeling he wanted to experience
at Mickey’s. The experience he sought was
the eating of a succulent hamburger that was actually delivered to his table by
a live human being. He had believed that
McDonalds makes “American hamburgers,” and it was time that he learned the
truth. I could also have taken him to
the Blue Moon Bar and Grill in Madison. Those
are, after all, the words to look for when you want to get a great burger: Tavern, Bar, Grill, Bar and Grill. If those words are not there, you might appreciate
what you are eating, but it isn’t a great burger.
When I lived
in France, I tried to make hamburgers at home, but the ground beef I could buy
did not taste fabulous like the ground beef I can buy in Madison. It is not clear why this was. It could be the race of cattle. Maybe the Charolais and the Salers, cattle
from the Auvergne region where I was living, just do not taste like Black Angus and Herefords. Maybe different parts of the steer are ground
in the first place. Whatever the reason,
I was never able to cook a great hamburger in France, so I could not
demonstrate to anyone what one tastes like.
All I could say is, “It isn’t what they serve at Hamburger Quick.” Beurck (or in English, “Blech”)
The problem
reverses itself as concerns baguettes. You
can’t get a great French baguette in Madison.
You can buy lots of great bread, wonderful German ryes, and some OK
baguettes. But no great baguettes. I have heard that the problem is that bakers
cannot buy veritable baguette flour. Why
not? How hard would it be to import flour for
baguettes?
These
seemingly trivial challenges -- getting the right ingredients -- appear to me
to foster big, smirking, culinary clichés.
This is entirely enhanced by the fact that countries make up foods, mostly
mediocre ones, and then attribute them to some other national origin. Think of “German Chocolate Cake.” I love German Kuchens. But “German
Chocolate Cake” is an American invention, and it falls short of its name. In the U.S. we also have something called
“French” salad dressing, which does not exist in France, even under another
name, and is considered by the French to be icky and very often is. In France there is a sauce called sauce américaine, which was developed in
France and as far as I can tell was never imported to the U.S. The sauce
américaine that you buy ready-made in a jar does not taste good on
anything, except the occasional hunk of beef fondue (which is, again, not Black
Angus or Hereford, and not so tasty). I
stay far away from sauce américaine,
except in Michelin starred restaurants, but even then, who comes to a starred
restaurant to eat meat or fish with a sauce
américaine? It is a psychological, if
not culinary, downer.
Is this done on purpose? What about
the justification, “The people from Country X would not like (or buy) the real
thing from Country Y”? The culinary
dumbing down story is patently false.
Americans like good baguettes and the French can appreciate a real hamburger. No one actually needs “German Chocolate Cake”
at all.
So here I am in Madison, WI.
Mystified. But not at all starved
for great food or drink.
No comments:
Post a Comment